Antminer KS5 vs IceRiver KS3L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS5 | Specification | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 640.0 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS5
IceRiver KS3L
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer KS5, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 77% better efficacité (150 vs 640 J/TH) in the Antminer KS5's favour. The IceRiver KS3L claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer KS5 and IceRiver KS3L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer KS5 300% more hashrate (20.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Antminer KS5 6% better power draw (3,000 vs 3,200 W)
- Antminer KS5 77% better efficacité (150 vs 640 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3L 1% better noise (76.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS3L 9% better weight (15.8 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 7% more heat output (10,236 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3L 24% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer KS5 | Metric | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,500 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$7.50 |
| -$14,365 | Net after 1 year | -$10,238 |
| -$16,730 | Net after 2 years | -$12,975 |
| -$19,096 | Net after 3 years | -$15,713 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3LScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS5150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer KS5 or IceRiver KS3L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer KS5 is more profitable at $-6.48/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer KS5 or the IceRiver KS3L better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS3L is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer KS5 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer KS5 or the IceRiver KS3L?
The IceRiver KS3L scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Antminer KS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer KS5 and IceRiver KS3L on J/TH?
The Antminer KS5 runs at 150.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH — a difference of 490.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (150 vs 640 J/TH).