Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 741
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 741 |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 7.3 TH/s |
| 5,510 W | Consommation électrique | 1,150 W |
| 9.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 157.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 4.3 kg |
| 18,800 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,924 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd
Canaan AvalonMiner 741
Based on BTC price of $73,540 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 7845% more hashrate (580.0 vs 7.3 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd's favour. That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd and Canaan AvalonMiner 741 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 7845% more hashrate (580.0 vs 7.3 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 741 79% better power draw (5,510 vs 1,150 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 94% better efficacité (9.5 vs 157.5 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 741 68% better weight (13.5 vs 4.3 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 379% more heat output (18,800 vs 3,924 BTU/hr)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 741 3% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 741 |
|---|---|---|
| $12,995 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| $6.07 | Daily net profit | -$2.52 |
| -$10,779 | Net after 1 year | -$919 |
| -$8,562 | Net after 2 years | -$1,838 |
| -$6,346 | Net after 3 years | -$2,756 |
| Takes ~5.9 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd$8.59/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner 741Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd or Canaan AvalonMiner 741 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd is more profitable at $6.07/day compared to $-2.52/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 741. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd or the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 741: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 741 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd and Canaan AvalonMiner 741 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd runs at 9.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 runs at 157.5 J/TH — a difference of 148.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 94% better efficacité (9.5 vs 157.5 J/TH).