Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 18.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 84.0 TH/s |
| 1,728 W | Consommation électrique | 3,150 W |
| 96.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 37.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 5,150.0 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 5,896 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,748 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th), which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 367% more hashrate (18.0 vs 84.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) and Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) 367% more hashrate (18.0 vs 84.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 45% better power draw (1,728 vs 3,150 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) 61% better efficacité (96.0 vs 37.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 64% better weight (5,150 vs 14,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) 82% more heat output (5,896 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 27% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $179 |
| -$3.51 | Daily net profit | -$4.59 |
| -$1,281 | Net after 1 year | -$1,853 |
| -$2,562 | Net after 2 years | -$3,528 |
| -$3,844 | Net after 3 years | -$5,202 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)37.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) is more profitable at $-3.51/day compared to $-4.59/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) or the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) and Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) runs at 96.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) runs at 37.5 J/TH — a difference of 58.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (96.0 vs 37.5 J/TH).