Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) vs Antminer T17+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) | Specification | Antminer T17+ |
|---|---|---|
| 13.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 64.0 TH/s |
| 1,310 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 97.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 50.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 4,470 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 84/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)
Antminer T17+
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer T17+ edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 374% more hashrate (13.5 vs 64.0 TH/s) in the Antminer T17+'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) and Antminer T17+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer T17+ 374% more hashrate (13.5 vs 64.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) 59% better power draw (1,310 vs 3,200 W)
- Antminer T17+ 48% better efficacité (97.0 vs 50.0 J/TH)
- Antminer T17+ 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 10.0 kg)
- Antminer T17+ 144% more heat output (4,470 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Antminer T17+ 171% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 84.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) | Metric | Antminer T17+ |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.67 | Daily net profit | -$5.42 |
| -$1,573 | Net after 1 year | -$1,977 |
| -$2,546 | Net after 2 years | -$3,953 |
| -$3,520 | Net after 3 years | -$5,930 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer T17+50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) vs Antminer T17+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.67/day compared to $-5.42/day for the Antminer T17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) or the Antminer T17+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer T17+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) vs Antminer T17+: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer T17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) and Antminer T17+ on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) runs at 97.0 J/TH while the Antminer T17+ runs at 50.0 J/TH — a difference of 47.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficacité (97.0 vs 50.0 J/TH).