iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell HS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 Max | Specification | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,150 W | Consommation électrique | 2,000 W |
| 262.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9.0 kg | Weight | 7.0 kg |
| 10,748 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1 Max
Goldshell HS3
Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 500% more hashrate (12.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The Goldshell HS3 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-S1 Max and Goldshell HS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 500% more hashrate (12.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3 37% better power draw (3,150 vs 2,000 W)
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 74% better efficacité (263 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS3 22% better weight (9.0 vs 7.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 58% more heat output (10,748 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS3 27% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-S1 Max | Metric | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $899 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,100 |
| -$7.16 | Daily net profit | -$4.73 |
| -$3,513 | Net after 1 year | -$2,828 |
| -$6,127 | Net after 2 years | -$4,555 |
| -$8,740 | Net after 3 years | -$6,283 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS3Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-S1 Max262.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell HS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3 is more profitable at $-4.73/day compared to $-7.16/day for the iBeLink BM-S1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell HS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max or Goldshell HS3?
The Goldshell HS3 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-S1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-S1 Max and Goldshell HS3 on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-S1 Max runs at 262.5 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 737.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficacité (263 vs 1,000 J/TH).