iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell SC Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 Max | Specification | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.9 TH/s |
| 3,150 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 262.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 9.0 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 10,748 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1 Max
Goldshell SC Box II
Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell SC Box II, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 87% better power draw (3,150 vs 400 W) in the Goldshell SC Box II's favour. The iBeLink BM-S1 Max claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-S1 Max and Goldshell SC Box II sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 532% more hashrate (12.0 vs 1.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC Box II 87% better power draw (3,150 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell SC Box II 20% better efficacité (263 vs 211 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC Box II 74% better weight (9.0 vs 2.3 kg)
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 688% more heat output (10,748 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC Box II 214% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-S1 Max | Metric | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $899 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $379 |
| -$7.16 | Daily net profit | -$0.90 |
| -$3,513 | Net after 1 year | -$706 |
| -$6,126 | Net after 2 years | -$1,034 |
| -$8,740 | Net after 3 years | -$1,361 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC Box IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Box II210.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell SC Box II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Box II is more profitable at $-0.90/day compared to $-7.16/day for the iBeLink BM-S1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-S1 Max or the Goldshell SC Box II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell SC Box II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-S1 Max at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell SC Box II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell SC Box II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-S1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell SC Box II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-S1 Max runs at 262.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Box II runs at 210.5 J/TH — a difference of 52.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficacité (263 vs 211 J/TH).