Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell HS Lite

Goldshell HS Lite

Taux de hachage 1.4 TH/s Puissance 1,250 W Efficiency 919.1 J/TH
VS
Goldshell HS3

Goldshell HS3

Taux de hachage 2.0 TH/s Puissance 2,000 W Efficiency 1,000.0 J/TH

Goldshell HS Lite vs Goldshell HS3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS Lite Specification Goldshell HS3
1.4 TH/s Taux de hachage 2.0 TH/s
1,250 W Consommation électrique 2,000 W
919.1 J/TH Efficiency 1,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
8.1 kg Weight 7.0 kg
4,265 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,824 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
Blake2b-sia Algorithme Blake2b-sia
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS Lite

Daily Revenue 0.00000062 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$3.00
Daily Profit -$2.95
Monthly -$88.64
Yearly -$1,078.50

Goldshell HS3

Daily Revenue 0.00000090 BTC $0.07
Daily Electricity -$4.80
Daily Profit -$4.73
Monthly -$142.01
Yearly -$1,727.74

Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell HS Lite l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 38% better power draw (1,250 vs 2,000 W). The Goldshell HS3 holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell HS Lite — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell HS Lite and Goldshell HS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell HS3 47% more hashrate (1.4 vs 2.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell HS Lite 38% better power draw (1,250 vs 2,000 W)
  • Goldshell HS Lite 8% better efficacité (919 vs 1,000 J/TH)
  • Goldshell HS3 14% better weight (8.1 vs 7.0 kg)
  • Goldshell HS3 60% more heat output (4,265 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell HS Lite 11% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Goldshell HS Lite Metric Goldshell HS3
$630 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,100
-$2.95 Daily net profit -$4.73
-$1,708 Net after 1 year -$2,828
-$2,787 Net after 2 years -$4,555
-$3,865 Net after 3 years -$6,283
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell HS Lite

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell HS Lite

919.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS Lite or the Goldshell HS3?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS Lite is more profitable at $-2.95/day compared to $-4.73/day for the Goldshell HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell HS Lite vs Goldshell HS3: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell HS3?

The Goldshell HS Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell HS Lite vs Goldshell HS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell HS Lite runs at 919.1 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 80.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficacité (919 vs 1,000 J/TH).