Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell HS Lite

Goldshell HS Lite

Taux de hachage 1.4 TH/s Puissance 1,250 W Efficiency 919.1 J/TH
VS
Goldshell HS5

Goldshell HS5

Taux de hachage 2.7 TH/s Puissance 2,650 W Efficiency 981.5 J/TH

Goldshell HS Lite vs Goldshell HS5

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS Lite Specification Goldshell HS5
1.4 TH/s Taux de hachage 2.7 TH/s
1,250 W Consommation électrique 2,650 W
919.1 J/TH Efficiency 981.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
8.1 kg Weight 8.5 kg
4,265 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,042 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b-sia Algorithme Blake2b-sia
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS Lite

Daily Revenue 0.00000062 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$3.00
Daily Profit -$2.95
Monthly -$88.64
Yearly -$1,078.50

Goldshell HS5

Daily Revenue 0.00000122 BTC $0.09
Daily Electricity -$6.36
Daily Profit -$6.27
Monthly -$188.11
Yearly -$2,288.65

Based on BTC price of $73,464 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS Lite comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 53% better power draw (1,250 vs 2,650 W). That said, the Goldshell HS5 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell HS Lite — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell HS Lite and Goldshell HS5 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell HS5 99% more hashrate (1.4 vs 2.7 TH/s)
  • Goldshell HS Lite 53% better power draw (1,250 vs 2,650 W)
  • Goldshell HS Lite 6% better efficacité (919 vs 981 J/TH)
  • Goldshell HS Lite 5% better weight (8.1 vs 8.5 kg)
  • Goldshell HS5 112% more heat output (4,265 vs 9,042 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell HS Lite 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell HS Lite Metric Goldshell HS5
$630 Upfront cost (MSRP) $949
-$2.95 Daily net profit -$6.27
-$1,709 Net after 1 year -$3,238
-$2,787 Net after 2 years -$5,526
-$3,866 Net after 3 years -$7,815
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell HS Lite

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell HS Lite

919.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Goldshell HS Lite vs Goldshell HS5: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS Lite is more profitable at $-2.95/day compared to $-6.27/day for the Goldshell HS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell HS5?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell HS5?

The Goldshell HS Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell HS Lite vs Goldshell HS5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell HS Lite runs at 919.1 J/TH while the Goldshell HS5 runs at 981.5 J/TH — a difference of 62.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficacité (919 vs 981 J/TH).