Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS3 | Specification | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.9 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 1,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 7.0 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS3
Goldshell SC Box II
Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell SC Box II comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 80% better power draw (2,000 vs 400 W). That said, the Goldshell HS3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS3 and Goldshell SC Box II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS3 5% more hashrate (2.0 vs 1.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC Box II 80% better power draw (2,000 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell SC Box II 79% better efficacité (1,000 vs 211 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC Box II 67% better weight (7.0 vs 2.3 kg)
- Goldshell HS3 400% more heat output (6,824 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC Box II 146% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell HS3 | Metric | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $1,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $379 |
| -$4.73 | Daily net profit | -$0.90 |
| -$2,828 | Net after 1 year | -$706 |
| -$4,555 | Net after 2 years | -$1,034 |
| -$6,283 | Net after 3 years | -$1,361 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC Box IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Box II210.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC Box II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Box II is more profitable at $-0.90/day compared to $-4.73/day for the Goldshell HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC Box II: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell SC Box II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC Box II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell SC Box II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC Box II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Box II runs at 210.5 J/TH — a difference of 789.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (1,000 vs 211 J/TH).