Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell HS3

Goldshell HS3

Taux de hachage 2.0 TH/s Puissance 2,000 W Efficiency 1,000.0 J/TH
VS
Goldshell SC5 Pro II

Goldshell SC5 Pro II

Taux de hachage 14.0 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 235.7 J/TH

Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS3 Specification Goldshell SC5 Pro II
2.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 14.0 TH/s
2,000 W Consommation électrique 3,300 W
1,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 235.7 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
7.0 kg Weight 11.5 kg
6,824 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b-sia Algorithme Blake2b-sia
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS3

Daily Revenue 0.00000090 BTC $0.07
Daily Electricity -$4.80
Daily Profit -$4.73
Monthly -$142.00
Yearly -$1,727.72

Goldshell SC5 Pro II

Daily Revenue 0.00000633 BTC $0.47
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.45
Monthly -$223.63
Yearly -$2,720.86

Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell SC5 Pro II comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 600% more hashrate (2.0 vs 14.0 TH/s). The Goldshell HS3 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell SC5 Pro II — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS3 and Goldshell SC5 Pro II sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell SC5 Pro II 600% more hashrate (2.0 vs 14.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell HS3 39% better power draw (2,000 vs 3,300 W)
  • Goldshell SC5 Pro II 76% better efficacité (1,000 vs 236 J/TH)
  • Goldshell HS3 39% better weight (7.0 vs 11.5 kg)
  • Goldshell SC5 Pro II 65% more heat output (6,824 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell HS3 27% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell HS3 Metric Goldshell SC5 Pro II
$1,100 Upfront cost (MSRP) $630
-$4.73 Daily net profit -$7.45
-$2,828 Net after 1 year -$3,351
-$4,555 Net after 2 years -$6,072
-$6,283 Net after 3 years -$8,793
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell HS3

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell SC5 Pro II

235.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell HS3 or Goldshell SC5 Pro II more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3 is more profitable at $-4.73/day compared to $-7.45/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS3 or Goldshell SC5 Pro II?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS3 or Goldshell SC5 Pro II?

The Goldshell HS3 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro II runs at 235.7 J/TH — a difference of 764.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (1,000 vs 236 J/TH).