Goldshell HS5 vs Goldshell SC Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS5 | Specification | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.9 TH/s |
| 2,650 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 981.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 8.5 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 9,042 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS5
Goldshell SC Box II
Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC Box II edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 85% better power draw (2,650 vs 400 W) in the Goldshell SC Box II's favour. The Goldshell HS5 claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS5 and Goldshell SC Box II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS5 42% more hashrate (2.7 vs 1.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC Box II 85% better power draw (2,650 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell SC Box II 79% better efficacité (981 vs 211 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC Box II 73% better weight (8.5 vs 2.3 kg)
- Goldshell HS5 563% more heat output (9,042 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC Box II 214% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell HS5 | Metric | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $949 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $379 |
| -$6.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.90 |
| -$3,238 | Net after 1 year | -$706 |
| -$5,526 | Net after 2 years | -$1,034 |
| -$7,815 | Net after 3 years | -$1,361 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC Box IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Box II210.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell HS5 or Goldshell SC Box II more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Box II is more profitable at $-0.90/day compared to $-6.27/day for the Goldshell HS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS5 or Goldshell SC Box II?
The Goldshell SC Box II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS5 or Goldshell SC Box II?
The Goldshell SC Box II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell HS5 vs Goldshell SC Box II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell HS5 runs at 981.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Box II runs at 210.5 J/TH — a difference of 771.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (981 vs 211 J/TH).