Innosilicon T3+ vs Whatsminer M50S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon T3+ | Specification | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 67.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 160.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,520 W |
| 49.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 22.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,010 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon T3+
Whatsminer M50S++
Based on BTC price of $76,991 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M50S++ edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 139% more hashrate (67.0 vs 160.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M50S++'s favour. The Innosilicon T3+ holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon T3+ and Whatsminer M50S++ sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M50S++ 139% more hashrate (67.0 vs 160.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon T3+ 6% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,520 W)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 55% better efficacité (49.3 vs 22.0 J/TH)
- Innosilicon T3+ 11% better weight (12.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 7% more heat output (11,260 vs 12,010 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon T3+ 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Innosilicon T3+ | Metric | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| $1,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,000 |
| -$5.55 | Daily net profit | -$2.78 |
| -$3,224 | Net after 1 year | -$5,014 |
| -$5,249 | Net after 2 years | -$6,029 |
| -$7,273 | Net after 3 years | -$7,043 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon T3+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S++22.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Innosilicon T3+ or the Whatsminer M50S++?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S++ is more profitable at $-2.78/day compared to $-5.55/day for the Innosilicon T3+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon T3+ vs Whatsminer M50S++: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon T3+ or the Whatsminer M50S++?
The Innosilicon T3+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Whatsminer M50S++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon T3+ and Whatsminer M50S++?
The Innosilicon T3+ runs at 49.3 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S++ runs at 22.0 J/TH — a difference of 27.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficacité (49.3 vs 22.0 J/TH).