Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell LB-BOX

Goldshell LB-BOX

Taux de hachage 175.0 GH/s Puissance 162 W Efficiency 925.7 J/TH
VS
Goldshell LB Lite

Goldshell LB Lite

Taux de hachage 1.6 TH/s Puissance 1,450 W Efficiency 895.1 J/TH

Goldshell LB-BOX vs Goldshell LB Lite

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell LB-BOX Specification Goldshell LB Lite
175.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 1.6 TH/s
162 W Consommation électrique 1,450 W
925.7 J/TH Efficiency 895.1 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
Weight 8.1 kg
553 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,947 BTU/hr
33/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
LBRY Algorithme LBRY
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell LB-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000008 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.39
Daily Profit -$0.38
Monthly -$11.49
Yearly -$139.79

Goldshell LB Lite

Daily Revenue 0.00000073 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$3.48
Daily Profit -$3.43
Monthly -$102.78
Yearly -$1,250.53

Based on BTC price of $73,513 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell LB Lite comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 826% more hashrate (0.2 vs 1.6 TH/s). The Goldshell LB-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell LB Lite — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell LB-BOX and Goldshell LB Lite sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell LB Lite 826% more hashrate (0.2 vs 1.6 TH/s)
  • Goldshell LB-BOX 89% better power draw (162 vs 1,450 W)
  • Goldshell LB Lite 3% better efficacité (926 vs 895 J/TH)
  • Goldshell LB Lite 795% more heat output (553 vs 4,947 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell LB-BOX 6% more score de minage domestique (33.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Goldshell LB-BOX Metric Goldshell LB Lite
$159 Upfront cost (MSRP) $672
-$0.38 Daily net profit -$3.43
-$299 Net after 1 year -$1,923
-$439 Net after 2 years -$3,173
-$578 Net after 3 years -$4,424
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell LB-BOX

Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell LB Lite

895.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell LB-BOX or the Goldshell LB Lite?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LB-BOX is more profitable at $-0.38/day compared to $-3.43/day for the Goldshell LB Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell LB-BOX vs Goldshell LB Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Goldshell LB-BOX vs Goldshell LB Lite: which fits a residential setup better?

The Goldshell LB-BOX scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell LB Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Goldshell LB-BOX and Goldshell LB Lite on J/TH?

The Goldshell LB-BOX runs at 925.7 J/TH while the Goldshell LB Lite runs at 895.1 J/TH — a difference of 30.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficacité (926 vs 895 J/TH).