Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell LB Lite

Goldshell LB Lite

Taux de hachage 1.6 TH/s Puissance 1,450 W Efficiency 895.1 J/TH
VS
Goldshell LB1

Goldshell LB1

Taux de hachage 87.0 GH/s Puissance 80 W Efficiency 919.5 J/TH

Goldshell LB Lite vs Goldshell LB1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell LB Lite Specification Goldshell LB1
1.6 TH/s Taux de hachage 87.0 GH/s
1,450 W Consommation électrique 80 W
895.1 J/TH Efficiency 919.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
8.1 kg Weight 1.1 kg
4,947 BTU/hr BTU Output 273 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
LBRY Algorithme LBRY
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell LB Lite

Daily Revenue 0.00000073 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$3.48
Daily Profit -$3.43
Monthly -$102.78
Yearly -$1,250.53

Goldshell LB1

Daily Revenue 0.00000004 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.19
Daily Profit -$0.19
Monthly -$5.67
Yearly -$69.02

Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell LB Lite l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1762% more hashrate (1.6 vs 0.1 TH/s). The Goldshell LB1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Goldshell LB Lite — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell LB Lite and Goldshell LB1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell LB Lite 1762% more hashrate (1.6 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • Goldshell LB1 94% better power draw (1,450.0 vs 80.0 W)
  • Goldshell LB Lite 3% better efficacité (895 vs 920 J/TH)
  • Goldshell LB1 86% better weight (8.1 vs 1.1 kg)
  • Goldshell LB Lite 1712% more heat output (4,947 vs 273 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell LB1 16% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell LB Lite Metric Goldshell LB1
$672 Upfront cost (MSRP) $700
-$3.43 Daily net profit -$0.19
-$1,923 Net after 1 year -$769
-$3,173 Net after 2 years -$838
-$4,424 Net after 3 years -$907
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell LB1

Score: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell LB Lite

895.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell LB Lite or the Goldshell LB1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LB1 is more profitable at $-0.19/day compared to $-3.43/day for the Goldshell LB Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell LB Lite or Goldshell LB1?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell LB Lite or the Goldshell LB1?

The Goldshell LB1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell LB Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell LB Lite and Goldshell LB1?

The Goldshell LB Lite runs at 895.1 J/TH while the Goldshell LB1 runs at 919.5 J/TH — a difference of 24.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficacité (895 vs 920 J/TH).