iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 GH/s |
| 1,240 W | Consommation électrique | 370 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 355,769.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | 10,000.0 kg |
| 4,231 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,262 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Classic
Jasminer X4-Q
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X4-Q, which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 70% better power draw (1,240 vs 370 W). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 Classic and Jasminer X4-Q actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iPollo V1 Classic 49% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4-Q 70% better power draw (1,240 vs 370 W)
- Jasminer X4-Q 56% better efficacité (800,000 vs 355,769 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4-Q 23% better weight (13,000 vs 10,000 kg)
- iPollo V1 Classic 235% more heat output (4,231 vs 1,262 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4-Q 10% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $210 |
| -$2.98 | Daily net profit | -$0.89 |
| -$1,455 | Net after 1 year | -$534 |
| -$2,541 | Net after 2 years | -$858 |
| -$3,628 | Net after 3 years | -$1,182 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4-QScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4-Q355,769.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Classic or Jasminer X4-Q more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-Q is more profitable at $-0.89/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Classic or the Jasminer X4-Q better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4-Q: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X4-Q scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4-Q: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-Q runs at 355,769.2 J/TH — a difference of 444,230.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (800,000 vs 355,769 J/TH).