Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Whatsminer M60S++

Whatsminer M60S++

Taux de hachage 220.0 TH/s Puissance 3,960 W Efficiency 18.0 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

Taux de hachage 282.0 TH/s Puissance 3,807 W Efficiency 13.5 J/TH

Whatsminer M60S++ vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Whatsminer M60S++ Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S
220.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 282.0 TH/s
3,960 W Consommation électrique 3,807 W
18.0 J/TH Efficiency 13.5 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
14.0 kg Weight 25.5 kg
13,512 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,990 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
MicroBT Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Whatsminer M60S++

Daily Revenue 0.00010124 BTC $7.91
Daily Electricity -$9.50
Daily Profit -$1.59
Monthly -$47.69
Yearly -$580.18

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

Daily Revenue 0.00012977 BTC $10.14
Daily Electricity -$9.14
Daily Profit $1.01
Monthly $30.24
Yearly $367.96

Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 3 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 25% better efficacité (18.0 vs 13.5 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S — l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Whatsminer M60S++ and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S sit on each measurable spec:

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 28% more hashrate (220 vs 282 TH/s)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 4% better power draw (3,960 vs 3,807 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 25% better efficacité (18.0 vs 13.5 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M60S++ 45% better weight (14.0 vs 25.5 kg)
  • Whatsminer M60S++ 4% more heat output (13,512 vs 12,990 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Whatsminer M60S++ Metric MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S
$7,000 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$1.59 Daily net profit $1.01
-$7,580 Net after 1 year +$368
-$8,160 Net after 2 years +$736
-$8,741 Net after 3 years +$1,104
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

$2.60/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

13.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Whatsminer M60S++ vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S is more profitable at $1.01/day compared to $-1.59/day for the Whatsminer M60S++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Whatsminer M60S++ or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Whatsminer M60S++ or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Whatsminer M60S++ and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S?

The Whatsminer M60S++ runs at 18.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S runs at 13.5 J/TH — a difference of 4.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficacité (18.0 vs 13.5 J/TH).