Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Aisen A1 Pro

Aisen A1 Pro

Hashrate 23.0 TH/s Power 2,200 W Efficiency 95.7 J/TH
VS
Canaan Avalon Mini 3

Canaan Avalon Mini 3

Hashrate 37.5 TH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 21.3 J/TH

Aisen A1 Pro vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Aisen A1 Pro Specification Canaan Avalon Mini 3
23.0 TH/s Hashrate 37.5 TH/s
2,200 W Power Consumption 800 W
95.7 J/TH Efficiency 21.3 J/TH
Noise Level 33 dB
Weight 8.4 kg
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,730 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 65/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Aisen Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Aisen A1 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00001058 BTC $0.84
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$4.44
Monthly -$133.29
Yearly -$1,621.69

Canaan Avalon Mini 3

Daily Revenue 0.00001726 BTC $1.36
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$0.56
Monthly -$16.66
Yearly -$202.68

Based on BTC price of $79,082 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon Mini 3, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 78% better efficiency (95.7 vs 21.3 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Canaan Avalon Mini 3 — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Aisen A1 Pro and Canaan Avalon Mini 3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Canaan Avalon Mini 3 63% more hashrate (23.0 vs 37.5 TH/s)
  • Canaan Avalon Mini 3 64% better power draw (2,200 vs 800 W)
  • Canaan Avalon Mini 3 78% better efficiency (95.7 vs 21.3 J/TH)
  • Aisen A1 Pro 175% more heat output (7,506 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
  • Canaan Avalon Mini 3 150% more home mining score (26.0 vs 65.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Aisen A1 Pro Metric Canaan Avalon Mini 3
Upfront cost (MSRP) $710
-$4.44 Daily net profit -$0.56
-$1,622 Net after 1 year -$913
-$3,243 Net after 2 years -$1,115
-$4,865 Net after 3 years -$1,318
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Canaan Avalon Mini 3

Score: 65/100. 33 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon Mini 3

21.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Aisen A1 Pro or the Canaan Avalon Mini 3?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-4.44/day for the Aisen A1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Aisen A1 Pro vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is quieter at 33 dB compared to the Aisen A1 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Aisen A1 Pro or Canaan Avalon Mini 3?

The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Aisen A1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Aisen A1 Pro vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Aisen A1 Pro runs at 95.7 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 runs at 21.3 J/TH — a difference of 74.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficiency (95.7 vs 21.3 J/TH).