Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 GH/s | Hashrate | 330.0 MH/s |
| 2,350 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 1,566,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 727,272.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| — | Weight | 2.4 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Based on BTC price of $78,221 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 90% better power draw (2,350 vs 240 W) in the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330's favour. That said, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 sit on each measurable spec:
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 355% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 90% better power draw (2,350 vs 240 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 54% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 727,273 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 879% more heat output (8,018 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 154% more home mining score (26.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $899 |
| -$5.64 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$3,259 | Net after 1 year | -$1,109 |
| -$5,317 | Net after 2 years | -$1,319 |
| -$7,376 | Net after 3 years | -$1,530 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330727,272.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 runs at 727,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 839,393.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 727,273 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster