Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Jasminer X16-QE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Specification | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 GH/s | Hashrate | 1.8 GH/s |
| 2,350 W | Power Consumption | 550 W |
| 1,566,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 314,285.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| — | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,877 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Jasminer X16-QE
Based on BTC price of $74,306 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the Jasminer X16-QE offers 80% better efficiency at 314,285.7 J/TH compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) at 1,566,666.7 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QEScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-QE314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Jasminer X16-QE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-QE is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Jasminer X16-QE?
The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Jasminer X16-QE?
The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Jasminer X16-QE?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,252,381.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster