Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 360.0 GH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 614 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 500 J/TH) in the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)'s favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 972873% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 50% better power draw (360 vs 180 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 500 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 4% better weight (2.3 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 100% more heat output (1,228 vs 614 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 109% more home mining score (69.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $340 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.42 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$493 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$646 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$799 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-0.86/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,229.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 500 J/TH).