Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 720.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 360 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,228 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 500 J/TH) in the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)'s favour. The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 133233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.7 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 89% better power draw (3,200 vs 360 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 500 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 82% better weight (12.5 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 789% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,228 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 17% more home mining score (29.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.84 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$505 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$811 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,117 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) is more profitable at $-0.84/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W): which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,425.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 500 J/TH).
Compare Goldshell AE Max II with...
Compare Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) with...
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE Card
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE Max
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX II
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh