Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell AE Max II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell AE Max II |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 540.0 MH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 5,925,925.9 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 85 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell AE Max II
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell AE Max II wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 35% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 5,925,926 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell AE Max II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AE Max II 50% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max II 3% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,200 W)
- Goldshell AE Max II 35% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 5,925,926 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 35% better noise (55.0 vs 85.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max II 8% better weight (13.5 vs 12.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 3% more heat output (11,260 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 72% more home mining score (50.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell AE Max II |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,050 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$7.68 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$3,853 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$6,656 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$9,460 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE Max II5,925,925.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell AE Max II?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Max II is more profitable at $-7.68/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell AE Max II?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell AE Max II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell AE Max II?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH — a difference of 3,240,740.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 35% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 5,925,926 J/TH).