Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell AE Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell AE Max |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 360.0 MH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 9,166,666.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 50/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell AE Max
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell AE-BOX II wins on 4 of 5 factors (power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 84% better power draw (530 vs 3,300 W). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins efficiency. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell AE Max sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AE Max 567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 84% better power draw (530 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell AE Max 7% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 9,166,667 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 36% better noise (35.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 78% better weight (3.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 523% more heat output (1,808 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 30% more home mining score (65.0 vs 50.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell AE Max |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $870 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$7.92 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$3,761 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$6,652 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$9,542 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE Max9,166,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell AE Max?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell AE Max better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell AE Max: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell AE Max on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH — a difference of 648,148.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 9,166,667 J/TH).