Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell AE Card
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell AE Card |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 5.5 MH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 11,818,181.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell AE Card
Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell AE-BOX II, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, price-performance). The standout gap is 882% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell AE-BOX II's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE Card isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell AE Card diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 882% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 88% better power draw (530.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 17% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 11,818,182 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 89% better weight (3.0 vs 0.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 715% more heat output (1,808 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 9% more home mining score (65.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell AE Card |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.16 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$156 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$213 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$270 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE-BOX II9,814,814.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell AE Card more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell AE Card?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell AE Card?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Goldshell AE-BOX II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell AE Card on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH — a difference of 2,003,367.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 11,818,182 J/TH).