Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 205.0 MH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,073,170.7 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 93% better power draw (3,200 vs 220 W) in the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AE Max II 163% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 93% better power draw (3,200 vs 220 W)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 82% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,073,171 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 59% better noise (85.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 84% better weight (12.5 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 1355% more heat output (10,918 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 128% more home mining score (29.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$492 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$684 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$877 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE ProScore: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro1,073,170.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro runs at 1,073,170.7 J/TH — a difference of 4,852,755.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,073,171 J/TH).