Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.6 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 88.5 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (5,925,925.9 vs 88.5 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 481381% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 93% better power draw (3,200 vs 230 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 100% better efficiency (5,925,925.9 vs 88.5 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 99% better weight (12.5 vs 2,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 1291% more heat output (10,918 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 7% more home mining score (29.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $278 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.46 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$445 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$613 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$780 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD-BOX ProScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro88.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.46/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 88.5 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,837.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,925.9 vs 88.5 J/TH).