Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell KD2 |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 830 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 138.3 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 7,300.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,832 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell KD2
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell KD2 wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 138 J/TH) in the Goldshell KD2's favour. The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD2 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell KD2 1111011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD2 74% better power draw (3,200 vs 830 W)
- Goldshell KD2 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 138 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 7,300.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 286% more heat output (10,918 vs 2,832 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 4% more home mining score (29.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell KD2 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $828 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$1.78 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$1,476 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$2,125 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$2,773 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD2138.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell KD2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD2 is more profitable at $-1.78/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell KD2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD2: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell KD2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD2?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell KD2 runs at 138.3 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,787.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 138 J/TH).