Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell LB-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell LB-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 175.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 162 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 925.7 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 553 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | LBRY |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell LB-BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell LB-BOX, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 926 J/TH) in the Goldshell LB-BOX's favour. The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell LB-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell LB-BOX 32307% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell LB-BOX 95% better power draw (3,200 vs 162 W)
- Goldshell LB-BOX 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 926 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 1875% more heat output (10,918 vs 553 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell LB-BOX 14% more home mining score (29.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell LB-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $159 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.38 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$299 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$438 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$578 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell LB-BOXScore: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LB-BOX925.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell LB-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LB-BOX is more profitable at $-0.38/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell LB-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell LB-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell LB-BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell LB-BOX scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell LB-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell LB-BOX runs at 925.7 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,000.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 926 J/TH).