Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Goldshell AL Card
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Specification | Goldshell AL Card |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 120.0 GH/s |
| 480 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 541.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 3.3 kg |
| 1,638 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus
Goldshell AL Card
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 733% more hashrate (1.0 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus's favour. The Goldshell AL Card claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Goldshell AL Card diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 733% more hashrate (1.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL Card 86% better power draw (480.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 11% better efficiency (480 vs 542 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 32% better weight (2.2 vs 3.3 kg)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 638% more heat output (1,638 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL Card 109% more home mining score (34.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Metric | Goldshell AL Card |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $111 |
| -$1.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$536 | Net after 1 year | -$166 |
| -$944 | Net after 2 years | -$222 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 3 years | -$277 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Goldshell AL Card: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL Card is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-1.12/day for the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Goldshell AL Card: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AL Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or Goldshell AL Card?
The Goldshell AL Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Goldshell AL Card on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Goldshell AL Card runs at 541.7 J/TH — a difference of 61.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 11% better efficiency (480 vs 542 J/TH).