Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 480 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 480.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,638 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus
Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 480 J/TH) in the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus's favour. The Goldshell AE Max holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 277678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 85% better power draw (3,300 vs 480 W)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 480 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 84% better weight (13.5 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 587% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,638 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 47% more home mining score (50.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $129 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$1.12 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$536 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$944 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,351 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus is more profitable at $-1.12/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus runs at 480.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,186.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 480 J/TH).