Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh vs IceRiver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh | Specification | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 2,000,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 64/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh
IceRiver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS1 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh and IceRiver KS1 sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS1 1999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 83% better power draw (100 vs 600 W)
- IceRiver KS1 100% better efficiency (2,000,000 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 23% better noise (50.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS1 500% more heat output (341 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 25% more home mining score (64.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh | Metric | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $280 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$368 | Net after 1 year | -$3,012 |
| -$455 | Net after 2 years | -$3,525 |
| -$543 | Net after 3 years | -$4,037 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50MhScore: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS1600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh vs IceRiver KS1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-1.40/day for the IceRiver KS1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh or IceRiver KS1?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh is quieter at 50 dB compared to the IceRiver KS1 at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh or the IceRiver KS1?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 51/100 for the IceRiver KS1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh and IceRiver KS1 on J/TH?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh runs at 2,000,000.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,999,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (2,000,000 vs 600 J/TH).