Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs IceRiver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,580 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
IceRiver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS1 edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 600 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and IceRiver KS1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS1 49900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 83% better power draw (3,580 vs 600 W)
- IceRiver KS1 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS1 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 497% more heat output (12,215 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 70% more home mining score (30.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$3,012 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$3,525 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$4,037 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS1600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or the IceRiver KS1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or IceRiver KS1?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or IceRiver KS1?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs IceRiver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 600 J/TH).