Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
IceRiver KS2
Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the IceRiver KS2, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and IceRiver KS2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS2 666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 58% better power draw (500 vs 1,200 W)
- IceRiver KS2 100% better efficiency (1,666,667 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 31% better noise (45.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 73% better weight (4.0 vs 15.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS2 140% more heat output (1,706 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 19% more home mining score (62.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,000 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$6,025 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$7,050 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$8,075 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE1 LiteScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS2600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the IceRiver KS2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-2.81/day for the IceRiver KS2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or IceRiver KS2?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is quieter at 45 dB compared to the IceRiver KS2 at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the IceRiver KS2?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the IceRiver KS2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,066.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,666,667 vs 600 J/TH).