Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 73.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 2,920 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 40.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 11,000.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,963 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,027 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 81% better efficiency (210.0 vs 40.0 J/TH). The Antminer AL1 holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 356% more hashrate (16.0 vs 73.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 13% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,920 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 81% better efficiency (210.0 vs 40.0 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 11,000.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 15% more heat output (11,464 vs 9,963 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $550 |
| -$7.48 | Daily net profit | -$4.35 |
| -$12,731 | Net after 1 year | -$2,139 |
| -$15,462 | Net after 2 years | -$3,728 |
| -$18,193 | Net after 3 years | -$5,317 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) is more profitable at $-4.35/day compared to $-7.48/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 170.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (210.0 vs 40.0 J/TH).