Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 198.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 5,445 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 27.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,578 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 5380335% more hashrate (0.0 vs 198.0 TH/s) in the Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd's favour. That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd 5380335% more hashrate (0.0 vs 198.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 60% better power draw (2,200 vs 5,445 W)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 27.5 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer E9 Pro 5% better weight (14.2 vs 15.0 kg)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd 147% more heat output (7,506 vs 18,578 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd 10% more home mining score (40.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $6,000 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$5.87 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$8,141 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$10,283 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$12,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 Pro+ HydScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd27.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer E9 Pro is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-5.87/day for the Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer E9 Pro or Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd?
The Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd runs at 27.5 J/TH — a difference of 597,798.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 27.5 J/TH).