Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 332.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 5,644 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 17.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,257 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,090 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th), which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 9021639% more hashrate (0.0 vs 332.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 9021639% more hashrate (0.0 vs 332.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 61% better power draw (2,200 vs 5,644 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 17.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 10% better weight (14.2 vs 12.8 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 157% more heat output (7,506 vs 19,257 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 10% more home mining score (40.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,799 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$1.46 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$2,333 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$2,866 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$3,400 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)Score: 44/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is more profitable at $-1.46/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH — a difference of 597,809.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 17.0 J/TH).