Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.1 TH/s |
| 1,580 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| 1,398.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 6,100.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 5,391 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 59/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $79,134 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK-BOX comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 86% better power draw (1,580 vs 215 W) in the Goldshell CK-BOX's favour. The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) claws back ground on hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and Goldshell CK-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 8% more hashrate (1.1 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 86% better power draw (1,580 vs 215 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 85% better efficiency (1,398 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better weight (6,100.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 635% more heat output (5,391 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 111% more home mining score (28.0 vs 59.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $925 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$2,294 | Net after 1 year | -$573 |
| -$3,662 | Net after 2 years | -$747 |
| -$5,031 | Net after 3 years | -$921 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 59/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-3.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell CK-BOX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK-BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and Goldshell CK-BOX on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) runs at 1,398.2 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 1,193.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (1,398 vs 205 J/TH).