Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.1 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 59/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK-BOX edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 19090809% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK-BOX's favour. The Goldshell AE Card holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell CK-BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK-BOX 19090809% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 70% better power draw (65.0 vs 215.0 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 22% better noise (35.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Card 84% better weight (0.3 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 231% more heat output (222 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 20% more home mining score (71.0 vs 59.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$574 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$748 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$923 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell CK-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-0.48/day for the Goldshell CK-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell CK-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK-BOX at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Goldshell CK-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell CK-BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,977.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 205 J/TH).