Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.1 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 59/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell CK-BOX, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 205 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK-BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK-BOX 291567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 93% better power draw (3,300 vs 215 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 18% better noise (55.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 85% better weight (13.5 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 1435% more heat output (11,260 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 18% more home mining score (50.0 vs 59.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$574 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$748 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$923 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 59/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell CK-BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell CK-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell CK-BOX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,461.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 205 J/TH).