Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.1 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 59/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell CK-BOX wins on 6 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 205 J/TH) in the Goldshell CK-BOX's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell CK-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK-BOX 194344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 93% better power draw (3,200 vs 215 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 47% better noise (85.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 84% better weight (12.5 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 1388% more heat output (10,918 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 103% more home mining score (29.0 vs 59.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$574 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$748 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$923 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 59/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell CK-BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK-BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell CK-BOX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK-BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,721.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 205 J/TH).