Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Goldshell LT6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Specification | Goldshell LT6 |
|---|---|---|
| 504.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 3.4 GH/s |
| 800 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 1,587,301.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 955,223.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 12,500.0 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)
Goldshell LT6
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell LT6 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 565% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and Goldshell LT6 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell LT6 565% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 75% better power draw (800 vs 3,200 W)
- Goldshell LT6 40% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 955,224 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 65% better weight (4,400 vs 12,500 kg)
- Goldshell LT6 300% more heat output (2,730 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 36% more home mining score (30.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Metric | Goldshell LT6 |
|---|---|---|
| $165 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $970 |
| -$1.92 | Daily net profit | -$7.68 |
| -$866 | Net after 1 year | -$3,773 |
| -$1,567 | Net after 2 years | -$6,576 |
| -$2,267 | Net after 3 years | -$9,379 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT6955,223.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) or the Goldshell LT6?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell LT6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) or Goldshell LT6?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) or the Goldshell LT6?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell LT6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and Goldshell LT6?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the Goldshell LT6 runs at 955,223.9 J/TH — a difference of 632,077.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 955,224 J/TH).