Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) vs Bolon Miner B11
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) | Specification | Bolon Miner B11 |
|---|---|---|
| 28.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 70.0 TH/s |
| 1,596 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 57.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 47.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 7,000.0 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 5,446 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bolon Miner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)
Bolon Miner B11
Based on BTC price of $79,065 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bolon Miner B11, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 150% more hashrate (28.0 vs 70.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) and Bolon Miner B11 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bolon Miner B11 150% more hashrate (28.0 vs 70.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) 52% better power draw (1,596 vs 3,300 W)
- Bolon Miner B11 17% better efficiency (57.0 vs 47.1 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) 39% better weight (7,000 vs 11,500 kg)
- Bolon Miner B11 107% more heat output (5,446 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) 27% more home mining score (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) | Metric | Bolon Miner B11 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,599 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.81 | Daily net profit | -$5.37 |
| -$6,625 | Net after 1 year | -$1,961 |
| -$7,651 | Net after 2 years | -$3,922 |
| -$8,678 | Net after 3 years | -$5,884 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bolon Miner B1147.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) vs Bolon Miner B11: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-5.37/day for the Bolon Miner B11. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) or Bolon Miner B11?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) or Bolon Miner B11?
The Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bolon Miner B11). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) vs Bolon Miner B11: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) runs at 57.0 J/TH while the Bolon Miner B11 runs at 47.1 J/TH — a difference of 9.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (57.0 vs 47.1 J/TH).