Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bolon Miner B11
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bolon Miner B11 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 70.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 47.1 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bolon Miner |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bolon Miner B11
Based on BTC price of $77,337 and current network difficulty as of May 20, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bolon Miner B11 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 400% more hashrate (14.0 vs 70.0 TH/s) in the Bolon Miner B11's favour. That said, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bolon Miner B11 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bolon Miner B11 400% more hashrate (14.0 vs 70.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 59% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,300 W)
- Bolon Miner B11 51% better efficiency (96.4 vs 47.1 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 100% better weight (6.0 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Bolon Miner B11 144% more heat output (4,606 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 168% more home mining score (59.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bolon Miner B11 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$5.43 |
| -$1,350 | Net after 1 year | -$1,981 |
| -$2,350 | Net after 2 years | -$3,963 |
| -$3,351 | Net after 3 years | -$5,944 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bolon Miner B1147.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bolon Miner B11: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-5.43/day for the Bolon Miner B11. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bolon Miner B11 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bolon Miner B11 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bolon Miner B11: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bolon Miner B11). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bolon Miner B11 on J/TH?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bolon Miner B11 runs at 47.1 J/TH — a difference of 49.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 51% better efficiency (96.4 vs 47.1 J/TH).