Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Avalon A1246
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Specification | Avalon A1246 |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 90.0 TH/s |
| 2,385 W | Power Consumption | 3,420 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 12.3 kg |
| 8,138 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,669 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)
Avalon A1246
Based on BTC price of $79,151 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Avalon A1246 wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 70% more hashrate (53.0 vs 90.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Avalon A1246 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1246 70% more hashrate (53.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 30% better power draw (2,385 vs 3,420 W)
- Avalon A1246 16% better efficiency (45.0 vs 38.0 J/TH)
- Avalon A1246 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 12.3 kg)
- Avalon A1246 43% more heat output (8,138 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1246 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Metric | Avalon A1246 |
|---|---|---|
| $274 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,800 |
| -$3.73 | Daily net profit | -$4.83 |
| -$1,637 | Net after 1 year | -$3,562 |
| -$2,999 | Net after 2 years | -$5,324 |
| -$4,362 | Net after 3 years | -$7,086 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1246Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A124638.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or the Avalon A1246?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) is more profitable at $-3.73/day compared to $-4.83/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or Avalon A1246?
The Avalon A1246 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or Avalon A1246?
The Avalon A1246 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Avalon A1246?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 7.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficiency (45.0 vs 38.0 J/TH).