Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566HA |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 460.0 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Power Consumption | 8,188 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 17.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 20.0 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 27,938 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 23/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)
Canaan Avalon A1566HA
Based on BTC price of $77,866 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 721% more hashrate (56.0 vs 460.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and Canaan Avalon A1566HA actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 721% more hashrate (56.0 vs 460.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 69% better power draw (2,520 vs 8,188 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 60% better efficiency (45.0 vs 17.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 20.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 225% more heat output (8,598 vs 27,938 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 5% more home mining score (22.0 vs 23.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566HA |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,074 |
| -$4.04 | Daily net profit | -$3.17 |
| -$1,888 | Net after 1 year | -$6,230 |
| -$3,363 | Net after 2 years | -$7,387 |
| -$4,838 | Net after 3 years | -$8,543 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A1566HAScore: 23/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566HA17.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the Canaan Avalon A1566HA?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA is more profitable at $-3.17/day compared to $-4.04/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the Canaan Avalon A1566HA better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA scores 23/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566HA runs at 17.8 J/TH — a difference of 27.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficiency (45.0 vs 17.8 J/TH).