Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs Ebang Ebit E11++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E11++ |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 44.0 TH/s |
| 2,094 W | Power Consumption | 1,980 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 7,145 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,756 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)
Ebang Ebit E11++
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 20% more hashrate (53.0 vs 44.0 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E11++ holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Ebang Ebit E11++ sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 20% more hashrate (53.0 vs 44.0 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 5% better power draw (2,094 vs 1,980 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 12% better efficiency (39.5 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 6% more heat output (7,145 vs 6,756 BTU/hr)
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 8% more home mining score (26.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E11++ |
|---|---|---|
| $780 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.10 | Daily net profit | -$3.15 |
| -$1,911 | Net after 1 year | -$1,150 |
| -$3,041 | Net after 2 years | -$2,301 |
| -$4,172 | Net after 3 years | -$3,451 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Ebang Ebit E11++Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or Ebang Ebit E11++ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) is more profitable at $-3.10/day compared to $-3.15/day for the Ebang Ebit E11++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Ebang Ebit E11++ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Ebang Ebit E11++?
The Ebang Ebit E11++ scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Ebang Ebit E11++?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E11++ runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 5.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficiency (39.5 vs 45.0 J/TH).