Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs PiAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 500.0 GH/s |
| 3,250 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 30 dB |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 0.2 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
PiAxe
Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 21900% more hashrate (110.0 vs 0.5 TH/s). That said, the PiAxe isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and PiAxe sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 21900% more hashrate (110.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- PiAxe 100% better power draw (3,250.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 2% better efficiency (29.6 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- PiAxe 100% better weight (13,200.0 vs 0.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 21558% more heat output (11,089.0 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- PiAxe 218% more home mining score (22.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$3.80 | Daily net profit | -$0.02 |
| -$1,746 | Net after 1 year | -$85 |
| -$3,132 | Net after 2 years | -$92 |
| -$4,518 | Net after 3 years | -$98 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
PiAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)29.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the PiAxe?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PiAxe is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-3.80/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the PiAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The PiAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or PiAxe?
The PiAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and PiAxe on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the PiAxe runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficiency (29.6 vs 30.0 J/TH).