Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 110.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 13,200.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,177 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 6115% more hashrate (1.8 vs 110.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)'s favour. That said, the Antminer D9 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 6115% more hashrate (1.8 vs 110.0 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 13% better power draw (2,839 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 98% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 29.6 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 100% better weight (16.1 vs 13,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 14% more heat output (9,687 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $360 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$3.67 |
| -$5,463 | Net after 1 year | -$1,698 |
| -$7,925 | Net after 2 years | -$3,037 |
| -$10,388 | Net after 3 years | -$4,375 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)29.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) is more profitable at $-3.67/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer D9 or Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH — a difference of 1,574.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 29.6 J/TH).