Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S19 Pro

Antminer S19 Pro

Hashrate 110.0 TH/s Power 3,250 W Efficiency 29.6 J/TH
VS
PiAxe

PiAxe

Hashrate 500.0 GH/s Power 15 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH

Antminer S19 Pro vs PiAxe

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S19 Pro Specification PiAxe
110.0 TH/s Hashrate 500.0 GH/s
3,250 W Power Consumption 15 W
29.6 J/TH Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 30 dB
14.4 kg Weight 0.2 kg
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 51 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S19 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00005062 BTC $4.00
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$3.80
Monthly -$113.93
Yearly -$1,386.15

PiAxe

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit -$0.02
Monthly -$0.53
Yearly -$6.50

Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer S19 Pro edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 21900% more hashrate (110.0 vs 0.5 TH/s) in the Antminer S19 Pro's favour. The PiAxe holds the edge in power consumption and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer S19 Pro — wins on 4 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer S19 Pro and PiAxe actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer S19 Pro 21900% more hashrate (110.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • PiAxe 100% better power draw (3,250.0 vs 15.0 W)
  • Antminer S19 Pro 2% better efficiency (29.6 vs 30.0 J/TH)
  • PiAxe 60% better noise (75.0 vs 30.0 dB)
  • PiAxe 99% better weight (14.4 vs 0.2 kg)
  • Antminer S19 Pro 21558% more heat output (11,089.0 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S19 Pro 20% more home mining score (84.0 vs 70.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer S19 Pro Metric PiAxe
$2,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $79
-$3.80 Daily net profit -$0.02
-$3,886 Net after 1 year -$85
-$5,272 Net after 2 years -$92
-$6,658 Net after 3 years -$98
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S19 Pro

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S19 Pro

29.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer S19 Pro vs PiAxe: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PiAxe is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-3.80/day for the Antminer S19 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer S19 Pro or the PiAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The PiAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Antminer S19 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 Pro or the PiAxe?

The Antminer S19 Pro scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 70/100 for the PiAxe). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer S19 Pro and PiAxe on J/TH?

The Antminer S19 Pro runs at 29.6 J/TH while the PiAxe runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficiency (29.6 vs 30.0 J/TH).