Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S19j Pro

Antminer S19j Pro

Hashrate 100.0 TH/s Power 3,050 W Efficiency 30.5 J/TH
VS
PiAxe

PiAxe

Hashrate 500.0 GH/s Power 15 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH

Antminer S19j Pro vs PiAxe

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S19j Pro Specification PiAxe
100.0 TH/s Hashrate 500.0 GH/s
3,050 W Power Consumption 15 W
30.5 J/TH Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 30 dB
13.2 kg Weight 0.2 kg
10,407 BTU/hr BTU Output 51 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S19j Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00004602 BTC $3.65
Daily Electricity -$7.32
Daily Profit -$3.67
Monthly -$110.17
Yearly -$1,340.34

PiAxe

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit -$0.02
Monthly -$0.53
Yearly -$6.48

Based on BTC price of $79,269 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the PiAxe wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better power draw (3,050.0 vs 15.0 W). That said, the Antminer S19j Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and home mining score and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: PiAxe — wins on 3 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer S19j Pro and PiAxe actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer S19j Pro 19900% more hashrate (100.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • PiAxe 100% better power draw (3,050.0 vs 15.0 W)
  • PiAxe 2% better efficiency (30.5 vs 30.0 J/TH)
  • PiAxe 60% better noise (75.0 vs 30.0 dB)
  • PiAxe 98% better weight (13.2 vs 0.2 kg)
  • Antminer S19j Pro 20225% more heat output (10,406.6 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S19j Pro 20% more home mining score (84.0 vs 70.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer S19j Pro Metric PiAxe
$2,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $79
-$3.67 Daily net profit -$0.02
-$3,840 Net after 1 year -$85
-$5,181 Net after 2 years -$92
-$6,521 Net after 3 years -$98
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S19j Pro

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

PiAxe

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer S19j Pro vs PiAxe: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PiAxe is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-3.67/day for the Antminer S19j Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer S19j Pro vs PiAxe: which runs at a lower noise level?

The PiAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Antminer S19j Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19j Pro or the PiAxe?

The Antminer S19j Pro scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 70/100 for the PiAxe). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19j Pro and PiAxe?

The Antminer S19j Pro runs at 30.5 J/TH while the PiAxe runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficiency (30.5 vs 30.0 J/TH).